The Success of Everyday Cycling in Japan Defies Logic

Byron Kidd
7
Amsterdam does cycling infrastructure right, and we'd be fools not to learn from that experience. Denmark is no slouch in the cycling stakes either, so I've heard, you'd be crazy not to pick up some ideas from there. But as Velo-city 2014 gets underway in Adelaide this week I'd like to take the opportunity to remind everyone not to overlook Japan, a nation of 100 million cyclists and home to Tokyo the most bicycle dense mega-city in the world in which 16% of all trips made in a day are made by bicycle, and one whose cycling policy is completely illogical.

When you refer to cyclists in Japan you're referring to everyone as everyone rides a bicycle regardless of age, sex or income bracket. How can a country as densely populated as Japan, home to the worlds biggest auto makers, and most efficient public transport networks, possibly main such a healthy culture of everyday cyclists?

Sidewalk cycling. Even the police do it!
Japan's lack of cycling infrastructure is astonishing, Tokyo itself has just over 10km of cycling lanes despite the fact that 85% of its 13 million residents own a bicycle. As a result the majority of cyclists choose to cycle on the sidewalks (where they exist) a practise banned in cities around the world. The sidewalks that aren't teeming with cyclists darting around pedestrians are clogged with illegally parked bicycles. Due to lax education and enforcement of cycling laws by the authorities the Japanese have developed their own set of unwritten, culturally accepted, cycling rules many of which don't agree with those laid down by the law. On the surface it appears to be complete anarchy, an utterly hostile environment for cycling, yet everyone rides a bike without concern for their safety, everyone.

When investigating what makes cycling work in Japan there are a number of factors at play including the cost and inconvenience of owning a motor vehicle, the compact self sufficient suburbs where everything required for daily life is a short walk or ride away, and clean efficient public transport which renders private car ownership obsolete for the vast majority of city dwellers.

Cycling with an umbrella. Against the law, generally accepted practice
by Japanese cyclists.

But above all, the one factor that makes cycling work in Japan is the attitude of the Japanese people. Polite to a tee and possessing an almost psychotic desire to avoid confrontation Japanese pedestrians, cyclists and motorists respect each others right to the road and share the space with minimal fuss.

In late 2013 Scotland's road safety campaign labelled the "Nice Way Code" encouraged motorists and cyclists to simply "get along" and share the road. It was publicly lambasted by cycling safety experts and the campaign came to an early end as it seems good manners are too much to expect on Scottish roads. Surprisingly, it is an unwritten, unspoken, culturally accepted "Nice Way Code" that maintains order on what would otherwise be dangerously chaotic Japanese roads and sidewalks.

Japanese parents overturned a ban on cycling with two children.
While an extensive network of safe separated cycling infrastructure, one that will provide cyclists with the safety they deserve, is a major goal for any cycling friendly city to achieve it is worth noting that Japan supports tens of millions of everyday cyclists with third world cycling infrastructure, based on an unwritten set of rules that closely resemble a failed road safety campaign from Scotland.

What a disaster!

Cycling in Japan should not work, but it does, because the Japanese people have taken ownership of cycling and turned it into something that works for them as it has been neglected by the Japanese government for too long.

Japanese people cycle according to a set of culturally accepted rules they've honed themselves over time that sometimes run counter to the law. When new cycling laws are introduced that make cycling, and thus the lives of the Japanese people, more inconvenient the laws are largely ignored. Japanese cycle where they feel safe regardless of the law. Because Japanese officials don't understand cycling, and its importance in the daily lives of the Japanese people, because they don't provide the facilities and infrastructure to support their enormous population of cyclists, cyclists largely ignore officialdom and just get on with it.

Lack of cycling infrastructure in Japan sees sidewalks used for
walking, cycling and bicycle parking.
Almost everything about Japan's thriving cycling culture flies in the face of logic and therefore I encourage everyone attending Velo-city 2014 in Adelaide to learn from the expert speakers in attendance, but to also look beyond conventional wisdom and be open to the idea that there are many ways to reach the ultimate goal of becoming a thriving bicycle friendly city.

Cities are unique, their citizens and culture all different and what works to promote cycling in one city may fail in another. Therefore I believe it is important to gather ideas from cities all around the world, learning from those with experience and success, but also picking up new, sometimes disruptive ideas from emerging cycling cities, and those that do it just a little differently.




Tags

Post a Comment

7Comments
* Please Don't Spam Here. All the Comments are Reviewed by Admin.
  1. Well said...

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think you are missing a major factor in why cycling in Japan is so big - they HAVE the infrastructure. Unlike NA, their streets are typically very narrow, which restricts both vehicle volumes and speed. As a result, a good majority of streets are cycle tracks in their own right, without the need for dedicated infrastructure (which they wouldn't have room for anyways). It's not the culture, it the design of the cities themselves!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting perspective, but I think you misunderstand the objections to the NiceWay Code. Although the campaign *claimed* that it was about everyone just getting along and being nice to each other, the actual adverts pandered to the stereotypes of cyclists as red-light running scofflaws, and blamed pedestrians for looking at their phones - and ended with a newspaper advert that suggested cyclists shouldn't give the finger to motorists. Far from promoting the sort of politeness and mutual courtesy you describe in Japan it seemed designed to promote tension between all road users. That was why people rose up in arms against it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I believe that the underlying premise of the Nice Way Code was "Lets all get along" and there is nothing wrong with that but as you accurately point out the plan was very poorly executed, pandered to stereotypes and caused more tension between motorists, cyclists and pedestrians.

      Even if the Nice Way Code was executed more cleanly I still don't believe it would have met with success as the only way for motorists to identify with cyclists if for them to be cyclists for a while. A few days on a bicycle is much more likely to change their behaviour than a poster that saying "Play Nice".

      Delete
  4. Hi. Do you have any stats to show bicycle accident rates by country? I am wondering how you concluded that cycling is a success in Japan, in terms of safety.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kyoto is a great city for cycling around. You can cycle along the Kamo river across the whole of Kyoto without hindrance from traffic lights or cars and the scenery is phenomenal.

    Even the problem of bicycle parking has been eased with the introduction of new bicycle parks.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Agree with the principle that there may be things other countries can learn from Japan about cycling. Not so sure the cultural difference is the main driver of the difference though. Cycling in the UK, where I live, is atrophied despite a popular culture and road layout not completely dissimilar to Japan. Put people together on shared use, which is quite common, and people do share. Round me this extends to the nominally pedestrian-only footways too. Not much bowing, but lots of "sorry"s, "thank you"s and smiling.

    So I'm Just wondering if the difference is institutional rather than cultural - it takes fewer dissenting NIMBY (not in my back yard) voices to throw a spanner into the works in the UK because the beaurocracy doesn't filter consensually, or turn a blind eye (how can it with all that on-street CCTV). One of the Nice Way Code ads was pulled because 5 people objected to the depiction of a woman cycling without a helmet, That particular one was one of the best demonstrations of sharing the road in the series. She was given a large amount of room by an overtaking motorist and they exchanged friendly looks. As you say, sounds good on paper, and happens fairly often in practice, in my experience. But no, 5 people objected. Subsequently thousands signed a petition that it should actually be OK to show helmetless bike riders, but to no avail. Now all bike riders on UK TV have to be shown wearing a helmet. Round me most of the utility cyclists don't. UK is world champion at making a rod for its own back.

    While I agree that "A few days on a bicycle is much more likely to change their behaviour than a poster", there isn't really much incentive for that to happen. There are too few blind eyes being turned to minor cycling infractions, and too many to severe damage by motor vehicles. Maybe the UK could do with an AKB48 promoting cycling. Of course items like the 自転車協会 BAA ad featuring them wouldn't be allowed, because of the lack of helmets being worn.

    UK Anonymous

    ReplyDelete
Post a Comment

#buttons=(Accept !) #days=(20)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. Learn More
Accept !